Lecture 13B: From the Eye of the Storm
A discussion of Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God
(Reflections on Chapters 17-20)
By now you’ve finished reading the novel and you can look back over Janie’s entire journey and her various attempts to find love. How do we interpret the final chapters of the novel, which contain Tea Cake’s "brainstorm," following which "he had whipped Janie . . . . to [reassure] him in possession" (Their Eyes 140). Prior to this chapter, Janie and Tea Cake, in fits of jealousy, had fought each other around the room, but this new beating, which we are assured was "no brutal beating at all," seems different, disturbing (Their Eyes 140). After several chapters celebrating Tea Cake’s charm and tender treatment of Janie, we read: "He just slapped her around a bit to show he was boss" (Their Eyes 140). And the public aspect of the incident, the community’s response to it, disturbs me as well: "It aroused a sort of envy in both men and women" (Their Eyes 140). Those of us who are familiar with the cycles of violence and enmeshment that characterize domestic violence can see the pattern emerging here: "The way he petted and pampered her as if those two or three face slaps had nearly killed her made the women see visions and the helpless way she hung on him made men dream dreams" (Their Eyes 140). Readers may breathe a collective sigh of regret, here, as we watch Janie’s dream of finding a "bee for her blossom" seem again out of reach.

A key to understanding the turn in this relationship may be found in Hurston’s autobiography, Dust Tracks on the Road, in which she describes her passionate relationship with a man she identifies as A.W. P. In the following excerpt, she describes how his possessiveness leads to jealousy and ultimately violence:

If he could only have realized what a lot he had to offer, he need not have suffered so much through doubting that he could hold me. ...

He begged me to give up my career, marry him, and live outside of New York City. I really wanted to do anything he wanted me to do, but that one thing I could not do. He felt that he did not matter to me enough. He was the master kind. All, or nothing, for him.

The terrible thing was that we could neither leave each other alone, nor compromise. . . .One night (I didn't decide this) something primitive inside me tore past the barriers and before I realized it I had slapped his face. ...He paid me off then and there with interest. No broken bones, you understand, and no black eyes. . . .

Then I knew I was too deeply in love to be my old self. For always a blow to my body had infuriated me beyond measure. . . .But somehow, I didn't hate him at all. We sat down on the floor and each of us tried to take all the blame. He went out and bought some pie and I made a pot of hot chocolate and we were more affectionate than ever. The next day he made me a bookcase that I needed and you couldn't get a pin between us.

But fate was watching us and laughing. (Dust 186; also in I Love Myself 76)

Following this incident, the relationship between Hurston and A.W. P. further disintegrated, and Hurston departed for Jamaica, where she wrote Their Eyes Were Watching God at a feverish pace in just six short weeks. In fact, Hurston herself suggested that she "processed" her relationship with A.W. P. through her writing: "The plot was far from the circumstances, but I tried to embalm all the tenderness of my passion for him in Their Eyes Were Watching God" (Dust 260).

Hurston’s mixed feelings for A.W.P. are evident as we read between the lines of her autobiography. Similarly, readers may have mixed feelings about Tea Cake. But why, we wonder, does Janie go on after the beating without questioning her lover’s behavior? Can we explain her uncritical view by considering the time period of the novel, the 1930s? Even if Janie fails to speak out, can we get any sense of how Hurston herself viewed Tea Cake’s possessiveness and violence? Some critics, like Mary Helen Washington, in her introduction to the novel, questions "its uncritical depiction of violence toward women . . . ." (xiv).

Another critic, Kathleen Davies, suggests that Hurston uses a "double" voice, incorporating suggestive imagery rather than direct criticism of Tea Cake, because it has been "difficult for black women writers to criticize the sexism of black men without appearing to corroborate white racism" (148). Although indirect, through imagery Hurston could "both tell [about the abuse] and protect the black man" (148). Davies points out that although no woman in the novel rises up in anger about Tea Cake’s violence (on the contrary, they "envy" it), Nature itself, through the hurricane that strikes the ‘Glades unmercifully, expresses "rage at the victimization of women" (154). This connection between anger and the hurricane is subtly foreshadowed in Sop-de-Bottom’s description of what his wife’s reaction would be if he beat her: "Mah woman would spread her lungs all over Palm Beach County, let alone knock out mah jaw teeth . . . . She got ninety-nine rows uh jaw teeth and git her good and mad, she’ll wade through solid rock up to her hip pockets" (Their Eyes 141, emphasis added). Within just a few pages, the hurricane strikes and "[U]nder its multiplied roar could be heard a mighty sound of grinding rock and timber and a wail" (Their Eyes 153, emphasis added).

Certainly, one could view Tea Cake’s decision to stay on the muck as the hurricane threatened and nearly everyone else had left as a kind of fatal arrogance, ultimately resulting in his death. In the final scene between them, Janie faces a choice between dying at her rabid lover’s hand or killing him in self defense. In perhaps her most radical act of self-preservation, she chooses the latter.

How, finally, do we assess Janie’s journey? Did she ever achieve her dream? Here’s one critic’s summation: "An incredibly affirmative novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God also portrays a black woman’s poignant yearning to merge her quest for liberation with that of the black man, while maintaining her right to live without his abuse. It illustrates how the double voice of one black woman provided a way for her to speak, to write—to create art—and, thus, to survive" (Davies 157). If nothing else, Janie’s journey brought her wisdom, a rare commodity in her community. As she tells her friend at the end of her tale: "It’s a known fact, Pheoby, you got tuh go there tuh know there. . . . Two things everbody’s got tuh do fuh theyselves. They got tuh go tuh God, and they got tuh find out about livin’ fuh theyselves" (Their Eyes 183). Probably what’s most remarkable about this novel is that it’s one of the first—and still one of the best—to tell the story of how one woman found out about living for herself.

Works Cited

Davies, Kathleen. "Zora Neale Hurston’s Poetics of Embalmment: Articulating the Rage of Black Women and Narrative Self-Defense." African American Review. 26:1 (1992): 147-160.

Hurston, Zora Neale. Dust Tracks on the Road. New York: Harper & Row, 1990.

---. Their Eyes Were Watching God. New York: Harper & Row, 1990.

Ed. Walker, Alice. I Love Myself When I Am Laughing . . . And Then Again When I Am Looking Mean and Impressive. Old Westbury, NY: The Feminist Press, 1979.

Washington, Mary Helen. Foreword. Their Eyes Were Watching God. Zora Neale Hurston. New York: Harper & Row, 1990. Vii-xiv.